ArticlePloS one2026
An automatic weighing device for measuring the consumption of cleaning agents in mechanical cleaning equipment.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to develop an automatic weighing device based on embedded technology for accurately monitoring the consumption of various cleaning agents during each cleaning cycle of mechanical cleaning equipment used in the Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD).
methodsThe hardware of the automatic weighing device included an ESP32 development board, HX711 module, infrared sensor, load cell, and display screen, with the circuit having been designed using a printed circuit board. After each cleaning cycle of the mechanical cleaning equipment, the device automatically calculated the consumption of cleaning agents. To validate its accuracy, the device's measurements were compared with the gold standard (volumetric measurement method). Additionally, the device was installed on a washer-disinfector for practical application testing to evaluate its performance. A mobile APP was also developed to enable real-time synchronization of data displayed on the screen of the automatic weighing device.
resultsA total of 20 comparative tests were conducted between the automatic weighing device and the volumetric method. The mean difference in measured cleaning agent consumption was 0.16 mL (95% CI: -0.24 to 0.56), with the interquartile range of absolute differences being 0.54 mL-1.06 mL. The expected consumption values for enzymatic and alkaline cleaning agents for the washer-disinfector were 100 g and 60 g per cycle, respectively. During the first 52 cleaning cycles, the average consumption of enzymatic detergent was 88.46 g (95% CI: 85.81-91.18), and that of alkaline detergent was 49.45 g (95% CI: 48.51-50.40), both significantly below the expected values. After replacing the peristaltic pump hose, a subsequent test of 55 cleaning cycles showed average consumptions of 97.70 g (95% CI: 96.40-99.00) for enzymatic detergent and 59.67 g (95% CI: 58.90-60.44) for alkaline detergent, both closely approaching the expected values.
conclusionThe automatic weighing device demonstrated reliable measurement performance, simple structure, high compatibility, and stable operation. It is easy to install, use, and maintain, offering a feasible and scientifically effective technical solution for accurately monitoring cleaning agent consumption in CSSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.