ArticlePloS one2026
RETRACTED: Advanced machine learning-guided optimization platform for high-yield soluble expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A in engineered Escherichia coli strains.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-07-13Concerns/Issues about Article · Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · False/Forged Affiliation · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/8C5B48116622BAA8BB8D458B6A273D
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe recombinant production of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A (ETA), a critical component for immunotoxin development, remains hindered by its complex disulfide bond architecture, cytotoxicity, and aggregation propensity. Despite recent advancements in strain engineering, a systematic, data-driven approach integrating high-throughput screening with machine learning for ETA optimization has remained largely unexplored.
methodsWe implemented a combinatorial optimization platform, screening 12 engineered E. coli strains across a matrix of four induction temperatures, three chaperone systems, and four redox-modulating additives. A high-throughput fluorescence-based solubility reporter was developed for rapid screening of 576 unique conditions, followed by training of an XGBoost machine learning model to predict soluble yield. The model was validated using 5-fold cross-validation with hyperparameter optimization to mitigate overfitting. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression.
resultsThe disulfide-competent strain SHuffle T7, induced at 12°C with co-expression of the DnaKJE/GroEL chaperone system and supplementation with 2 mM oxidized glutathione, yielded 3.24 ± 0.4 mg/L of soluble, enzymatically active ETA. This represents a 15-fold improvement over conventional BL21(DE3) systems (F (11,24) = 45.32, p < 0.0001). Structural validation via redox-sensitive PAGE and nano-LC-MS/MS confirmed native disulfide pairing. The trained machine learning model demonstrated high predictive accuracy (R² = 0.92, RMSE = 0.24 mg/L) with consistent performance across cross-validation folds (average R² = 0.91 ± 0.02), and identified cytoplasmic redox potential and translational rate as the primary determinants of soluble expression.
conclusionsWe present an integrated platform that synergizes experimental high-throughput screening with predictive machine learning to overcome the challenge of ETA production. While validation on additional protein targets is needed to fully establish generalizability, this work establishes an optimized, scalable protocol for therapeutic-grade ETA and provides a transferable computational framework for the rational optimization of other complex, disulfide-rich proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.