Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41961864›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Efficiency, accuracy and robustness of probability generating function based parameter inference method for stochastic biochemical reactions.

Shiyue Li, Yiling Wang, Zhanpeng Shu, Ramon Grima, Qingchao Jiang, Zhixing Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shiyue LiState Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Yiling WangState Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Zhanpeng ShuCollege of Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai, China.
Ramon GrimaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1266-8169
Qingchao JiangState Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Zhixing CaoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2600-5806

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochemical reactions are inherently stochastic, with their kinetics commonly described by chemical master equations (CMEs). However, the discrete nature of molecular states renders likelihood-based parameter inference from CMEs computationally intensive. Here, we introduce an inference method that leverages analytical solutions in the probability generating function (PGF) space and systematically evaluate its efficiency, accuracy, and robustness. Across both steady-state and time-resolved count data, our numerical experiments demonstrate that the PGF-based method consistently outperforms existing approaches in terms of both computational efficiency and inference accuracy, even under data contamination. These favorable properties further enable the extension of the PGF-based framework to model selection-a task typically considered computationally prohibitive. Using time-resolved data, we show that the method can correctly identify complex gene expression models with more than three gene states, a task that cannot be reliably achieved using steady-state data alone.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsComputer SimulationKineticsModels, StatisticalProbabilityStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID41961864
PMCPMC13068235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.