ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Infants use helping to infer the existence and strength of caring relationships.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infants use helping to infer the existence and strength of caring relationships.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Eleven-Month-Old Infants Preferentially Look at Helpers But Do Not Reliably Evaluate Inconsistent Actors.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prosocial and antisocial behaviors can reflect the actor's positive or negative feelings toward a specific person and their broader disposition toward others' welfare. Observers' inferences about these motives shape what they learn about the actor's social relationships and moral character, thereby informing expectations about the actor's future behaviors. In four preregistered studies, we used violation-of-expectation looking methods to investigate 14- and 15-mo-old infants' inferences about social motives by first showing them helping and hindering events and then assessing their expectations for those actors' future actions. If infants use helping and hindering to infer disposition-based motives, they should extend expectations about future helping to others. Alternatively, if they infer relationship-based motives, their expectations should be restricted to the initial interactants. In Experiments 1 and 2, infants first observed two actors, one who helped and another who hindered a common target. At test, infants expected the helper would help the same target in a new, perceptually distinct situation. However, this expectation did not generalize to a new target, suggesting infants inferred specific relationships, not general dispositions. In Experiments 3 and 4, we assessed whether infants used information about the existence or strength of a helper's relationships to predict who they would prioritize helping in the future. We found that infants used patterns of selective helping among multiple targets to make transitive inferences about whose needs the helper would prioritize. Taken together, this suggests that infants use such observations of helping to infer whether, and how much, the helper cares for their social partner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.