ArticlePloS one2026
Large Scale Food Fortification (LSFF) in East, Central, and Southern Africa: Gaps, opportunities and the way forward.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicronutrient deficiencies affect 2 billion people globally, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, where iron, vitamin A, iodine, zinc, calcium, selenium, folate, and vitamin B12 deficiencies are common. Large Scale Food Fortification (LSFF) - addition of micronutrients to commonly consumed, industrially processed foods and condiments - can improve micronutrient intake at population level. Progress across East Central Africa Health Community (ECSA-HC) and the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) regarding fortification of wheat and maize flour, edible oils, and sugar has been uneven. This paper discusses the current status of LSFF, challenges and opportunities to inform future LSFF programming.
methodsQualitative situation analysis comprised of 19 key informant interviews (KIIs) with global, regional, and country stakeholders. KIIs were analyzed by themes and subthemes using Dedoose software.
resultsFindings reveal wide variation in LSFF progress across ECSA-HC and SADC countries, with better institutionalized legislation, coordination, and monitoring in ECSA-HC countries than SADC countries. Key challenges are: weak enforcement of mandatory food fortification standards, little data on market reach and coverage of fortified foods and limited country capacity for monitoring LSFF programs. Opportunities to strengthen LSFF program implementation, measured by compliance and coverage of fortified foods, center on raising awareness of public health benefits of LSFF via targeting governments and consumers, engaging private sector to improve compliance with fortification standards, and incorporating small-scale producers into LSFF.
conclusionMoving forward, investment on LSFF programming by country governments, and private sector should prioritize integrating reach and coverage indicators into existing national health surveys. Supporting public education campaigns to raise awareness of fortified foods' health benefits, improving collaboration between government regulators and industry quality assurance personnel (i.e., small millers) through targeted fiscal policies and/or incentives as well capacity strengthening for compliance to fortification standards to attain intended nutrition outcomes for LSFF programming is sorely needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.