ArticlePloS one2026
DNA source and primer choice affect the reliability of metabarcoding for nematode community profiling in agricultural soils.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Network Topology and Undominated Assembly Processes Govern Soil Nematode Community Responses to Forest Type.Microorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of metabarcoding has greatly advanced our understanding of nematode ecology by overcoming many limitations associated with traditional morphology-based methods. The NF1-18Sr2b (NF1) is the standard and widely used primer pair to assess nematode communities. However, this primer also presents challenges, especially when applied to DNA extracted directly from soil, where it has been shown to underestimate species richness. Consequently, soil DNA extraction (SE) has been viewed as a less attractive option for metabarcoding studies. To explore whether nematode DNA extraction (NE) can serve as a viable option for metabarcoding studies, we compared two degenerate primer pairs, NemF-18Sr2b (NemF) and NemFopt-18Sr2bRopt (NemFopt) to NF1. The study used two DNA sources: NE, and SE derived from 10 g and 1.25 g of dry agricultural soils. Our findings indicate that the NemF and NemFopt primers yielded higher taxonomic resolution and species richness in both SE and NE compared to NF1. Specifically, NF1 detected only 2-4% of nematode sequences in SE and 69% in NE, whereas NemFopt detected the highest proportion, with 100% of nematode sequences in NE and >70% in SE. Although none of the primers amplified all taxa, NF1 was associated with higher undetected taxa. NemFopt in the 10 g SE identified nematode assemblages comparable to those from NE, suggesting that SE can effectively capture nematode communities similar to NE. Nematode community profiles and ecological indices were stable across soil DNA input volumes and DNA sources. Maturity index and enrichment index did not differ significantly between NE and SE. Community similarity across extraction methods varied with primer choice, with NemFopt showing the greatest consistency. Although this study was limited to two soil types, two field sites, and three primer sets, our results suggest that increasing primer specificity can reduce the amount of soil required for metabarcoding and make SE a viable option. Moreover, primer choice, soil type, and DNA source can significantly affect nematode diversity estimates and ecological interpretations, highlighting the need for primer standardization in nematode metabarcoding studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.