ArticlePloS one2026
Judgments of American English male talkers who are perceived to sound gay or straight: Which personal attributes are associated with each group of talkers?
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upon hearing a spoken utterance, listeners associate certain attributes (e.g., emotional) with self-identified gay male talkers and other attributes (e.g., reserved) with self-identified straight male talkers. In the current study, we explored whether listeners associated additional personal attributes with these types of talkers, and whether different contexts (e.g., listeners being informed of the talker's sexual orientation) affected how strongly listeners associated personal attributes with talkers. Twenty-four talkers (twelve who self-identified as gay and twelve who self-identified as straight) from an established corpus were examined. Notably, previous work found that these talkers' self-described sexual orientation (SO) did not always align with listener-perceived SO (i.e., a self-identified gay talker was perceived as straight sounding, and vice versa). Listeners evaluated these talkers for eight attributes (e.g., boring, confident, intelligent, mad, old, outgoing, sad, and stuck-up) in three contexts: talkers' SO not referenced, talkers' SO truthfully referenced (i.e., listeners were informed that a straight talker was straight), and talkers' SO falsely referenced (i.e., listeners were informed that a straight talker was gay). Results suggested that self-identified gay and straight talkers whom listeners perceived as sounding gay were perceived as confident, mad, stuck-up, and outgoing; self-identified gay and straight talkers whom listeners perceived as sounding straight were perceived as sad and old. Furthermore, listeners' judgments did not differ when the talkers' SO was truthfully referenced, falsely referenced, or not referenced for all attributes except sad and stuck-up. The results indicate that perceived SO generally has the greatest effect on listeners' perception of a talker's attributes and, for most attributes examined, this is the case regardless of whether the listeners are informed (truthfully or falsely) of the talkers' self-identified SO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.