ArticlePloS one2026
Navigating international academic collaboration: The Arabic translation and cultural adaptation of the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework index.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework index (QMNCFi) is a validated English-language instrument developed to assess women's experiences during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period. These experiences include respect, dignity, communication, continuity of care, and involvement in decision-making. Despite Arabic being spoken in 22 countries, substantial variations exist in dialects, terminology, and healthcare practices. Because maternity care models, communication styles, and clinical terminology vary across Arabic-speaking contexts, ensuring semantic and experiential equivalence is essential when adapting the QMNCFi for use in Middle Eastern settings. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the QMNCFi into Arabic and to document the international collaborative methodological process supporting this adaptation.
methodsWe followed an internationally recognized six-stage approach for translation and cultural adaptation (forward translation, synthesis, back translation, expert committee review, pre-final testing, and finalization). Two research teams, representing institutions across five countries, collaborated under a unified protocol. Cognitive interviews were conducted with 48 postpartum participants in Palestine and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
resultsRefinements included adding a country identifier within demographic items to distinguish data collection sites, aligning demographic categories (e.g., education and income/currency), clarifying items with context-relevant examples, and adding "not applicable" where appropriate. These adjustments improved clarity and contextual fit without altering item order or scoring. Inter-rater agreement reached 99.1%, exceeding the a priori 80% benchmark. Operational challenges, including ethics approvals, data-sharing restrictions, supervision structures, and cross-site coordination, were addressed through structured mentorship, version-controlled documentation, and regular joint meetings.
conclusionA shared language did not ensure semantic or experiential equivalence. Addressing institutional, regulatory, capacity, and linguistic factors was essential for developing a usable Arabic QMNCFi. This work provides a transparent methodological guideline for same-language, multi-country adaptation of health measurement tools and prepares the Arabic QMNCFi for psychometric validation and future implementation in Arabic-speaking maternity care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.