ArticlePloS one2026
Environmental health literacy competencies and teaching methods for students and health professionals in Primary Health Care: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental determinants play an increasingly important role in shaping population health, highlighting Environmental Health Literacy (EHL) as a critical competency for Primary Health Care (PHC). Despite growing attention to environmental health education, evidence addressing EHL in PHC remains fragmented and inconsistently conceptualized. This scoping review aimed to systematically map existing evidence on environmental health literacy among health professions students and practicing professionals in PHC settings, with a focus on identifying core competency domains and educational interventions relevant to PHC practice. A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed across seven electronic databases, complemented by additional searches in Google Scholar and grey literature sources. Empirical and theoretical studies examining EHL or closely related environmental health constructs in PHC or PHC-relevant contexts were included. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 24 empirical studies and five theoretical contributions. This review represents the first synthesis explicitly framed within the EHL context for PHC. Across studies, five core EHL domains consistently emerged: environmental health knowledge, clinical skills, risk communication, equity-oriented attitudes, and systems-based advocacy. Building on this synthesis, the review proposes a consolidated set of global competencies for EHL in PHC and systematically maps educational and practice-based interventions aimed at developing these competencies, particularly multimodal and technology-enhanced approaches. While several interventions demonstrated improvements in knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy, evidence of sustained integration into routine PHC practice remained limited. Overall, the findings demonstrate that EHL is a multidimensional and foundational competency for PHC but is most often addressed implicitly rather than explicitly. Bridging the gap between education and clinical application will require sustained curricular integration, institutional support, and system-level alignment to ensure that PHC professionals are equipped to address environmental determinants of health in an increasingly complex global context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.