ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of long-range temporal correlations during overt and covert attention in a steady state visual evoked potential based brain-computer interface.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gaze control is required for successful brain-computer interface (BCI) operation in different paradigms. It has been shown that the performance of a steady-state visual evoked potential-based BCI is lower in covert attention when the participants attend to the stimuli covertly, without the need to move their eyes. Some studies in the literature have tried to find the brain regions that are affected by covert attention. Moreover, it has been shown that the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio is smaller in covert attention than in overt attention. Based on the fact that brain oscillations exhibit long-range temporal correlations (LRTCs), which can be measured by the Hurst exponent, and estimated using the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), this is the first study focusing on the DFA differences in overt and covert attention in an SSVEP-based BCI experiment. The main hypothesis is that there should be differences between DFA exponents of EEG in overt and covert attention, as there are differences in SNR between these attentional states. Gender differences between overt and covert attention were also evaluated using DFA. The results revealed significant differences in LRTCs depending on the gender and the attentional state. These results could be taken into account for an efficient SSVEP-based BCI design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.