Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41961787›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Evaluation of long-range temporal correlations during overt and covert attention in a steady state visual evoked potential based brain-computer interface.

Zafer İşcan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zafer İşcanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9832-6591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaze control is required for successful brain-computer interface (BCI) operation in different paradigms. It has been shown that the performance of a steady-state visual evoked potential-based BCI is lower in covert attention when the participants attend to the stimuli covertly, without the need to move their eyes. Some studies in the literature have tried to find the brain regions that are affected by covert attention. Moreover, it has been shown that the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio is smaller in covert attention than in overt attention. Based on the fact that brain oscillations exhibit long-range temporal correlations (LRTCs), which can be measured by the Hurst exponent, and estimated using the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), this is the first study focusing on the DFA differences in overt and covert attention in an SSVEP-based BCI experiment. The main hypothesis is that there should be differences between DFA exponents of EEG in overt and covert attention, as there are differences in SNR between these attentional states. Gender differences between overt and covert attention were also evaluated using DFA. The results revealed significant differences in LRTCs depending on the gender and the attentional state. These results could be taken into account for an efficient SSVEP-based BCI design.

Indexed as

AttentionBrainBrain-Computer InterfacesEvoked Potentials, VisualAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSignal-To-Noise RatioYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41961787
PMCPMC13068281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.