ArticlePloS one2026
Psychological help-seeking behaviours amongst those living with Inflammatory Bowel Disease; A cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo explore the help-seeking preferences and behaviours of those living with Inflammatory Bowel Disease for negative emotions.
designA cross-sectional, descriptive, correlational study.
methodsThe sample consisted of 376 individuals living with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected via a questionnaire comprising both researcher-developed items and a validated patient-reported outcome measure. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including correlational and regression analysis were used for quantitative data. Qualitative latent content and count analysis was carried out on the textual data from open-ended survey items.
resultsParticipants reported moderately high intentions to seek help for negative emotions related to their Inflammatory Bowel Disease (M = 4.86, SD = 1.80), yet 59.8% had not done so despite experience such emotions. Prior help-seeking was reported by 45%, and 18.6% were currently receiving support. Regression analysis showed that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control explained 55.5% of the variance in behavioural intention, with subjective norms and attitudes as significant predictors. Previous help-seeking experience and surgical history were linked to greater intention to seek help, in addition to diagnosis, with individuals living with Crohn's Disease reported significantly higher help-seeking intentions than those with Ulcerative Colitis. Common barriers included lack of service awareness, wanting to solve the problem independently, and stigma. Participants strongly value accessible, affordable, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease-informed psychological support, integrated within routine Inflammatory Bowel Disease care and complemented by peer and community resources.
conclusionThe findings underscore the need for routine assessment of the psychological impact of living with Inflammatory Bowel Disease, timely referral to mental health services, and the integration of psychological care within standard Inflammatory Bowel Disease pathways. Implementing these changes is essential to delivering equitable, patient-centred care. The findings provide behavioural insight into factors associated with seeking help for negative emotions related to Inflammatory Bowel Disease and add to the growing body of literature emphasising the relevance of viewing psychological wellbeing as an important component of Inflammatory Bowel Disease care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.