ArticleMedicine2026
The impact of evidence-based continuity of care on the recurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events following interventional procedures in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the impact of evidence-based continuity of care (EBCC) on the recurrence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following interventional procedures in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 210 patients who underwent cardiovascular interventions at our hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the care method received: an EBCC group (n = 94) and a conventional care group (n = 116). Over a 12-month postoperative period, we assessed the incidence of MACE, quality of life, medication adherence, functional status, psychological well-being, and satisfaction with care. The incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the EBCC group compared to the conventional care group. Patients receiving continuity of care also demonstrated significant improvements in quality of life, medication adherence, functional status, and psychological health. Satisfaction with nursing care was notably higher in the continuity of care group. EBCC effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative MACE in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease. It enhances quality of life, medication adherence, psychological well-being, and patient satisfaction, thereby promoting comprehensive postoperative recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.