Trial reportMedicine2026
Comparative evaluation of human T lymphocytes in HIV patients treated with lamivudine + zidovudine combined with nevirapine versus efavirenz.
Trial report in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the efficacy of lamivudine + zidovudine plus nevirapine and efavirenz in the treatment hf human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). A total of 100 patients with HIV/AIDS admitted to our hospital from June 2021 to September 2024 were selected and randomly assigned into nevirapine and efavirenz groups (n = 50 per group). The nevirapine group was treated with lamidudine plus zidovudine combined with nevirapine, and the efavirenz group was treated with lamidudine plus zidovudine plus efavirenz. The primary outcomes measured were the changes of lymphocyte count and adverse effects after 3 months of treatment. There was no statistical difference in baseline information between the 2 groups. After treatment, CD3 + and CD4 + levels were higher in the nevirapine group than in the efavirenz group (P <.05, 95% CI: 45.2-98.7 for CD3 + and 32.8-76.4 for CD4+), and CD8 + levels were lower in the nevirapine group than in the efavirenz group (P <.05); the overall incidence of adverse effects in the nevavirapine group was significantly lower than that in the efavirenz group (P <.05). In HIV/AIDS patients, treatment with lamivudine + zidovudine combined with nevirapine resulted in significantly improved CD4 + T cell counts, enhanced immune function, and fewer adverse reactions compared to treatment with lamivudine + zidovudine plus efavirenz, suggesting superior clinical value of the nevirapine-containing regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.