ReviewTrends in hearing
Influence of the Electrode-Neuron Interface and Asymmetry of Pulses on the Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants: A Computational Study.
Review in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current spread in cochlear implants (CIs) degrades spectral resolution and speech perception by broadening neural excitation. Asymmetric pulses have been proposed to mitigate this issue; however, their practical application in CI strategies remains challenging owing to the potential temporal overlap between pulses from adjacent channels. In the present study, we employed a computational model to evaluate the effects of charge-balanced asymmetric pulses with varying second-phase durations on the spread of neural excitation (SOE) and neural activation. The SOE was assessed under different electrode-auditory nerve fiber (ANF) distances to explore the interaction between the pulse configuration and the neural interface. At greater electrode-ANF distances, increasing the second phase lowers the stimulation thresholds effect. However, at shorter distances, a prolonged second-phase duration induces neural inhibition and degraded neural activity patterns. Therefore, the efficacy of asymmetric pulses in reducing the SOE depends on the electrode position. Furthermore, a moderate increase in the second-phase duration may offer a promising direction for optimizing CI stimulation and enhancing speech perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.