ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2026
Chitooligosaccharide-based hydrogel microneedle for the effective transdermal delivery of vancomycin.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrogel Microneedle Patches (HMNPs) are effective transdermal drug delivery systems designed to provide a minimally invasive and painless transfer of the incorporated payloads across the stratum corneum barrier. Herein, Chitooligosaccharide (COS) based hydrogel microneedles of four different concentrations (15%, 20%, 25% and 30% PEGDA) were developed using Polyethylene Glycol Diacrylate (PEGDA) and Carboxymethyl Chitosan (CMC) as crosslinkers and Vancomycin hydrochloride (COVAN) as the incorporated drug. Several characterization methods, such as Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), were performed before evaluating their efficacy as a transdermal therapeutic cargo delivery depot through mechanical testing, swelling ratio, drug release performance, and antibacterial activity. All of the tested formulations exhibited adequate compressive strength over 0.2 N per microneedle and effective penetration capabilities across the stratum corneum barrier. The 30% HMNP exhibited the highest swelling at 255% after 24 h, whereas the 25% HMNP provided the highest drug release at 83% after 48 h, indicating a Fickian diffusion-induced drug release mechanism. This was confirmed by fitting drug release data into mass transfer models, where all formulations except the 30% HMNP's drug release data fit the Korsmeyer-Peppas model. Except for the 20% HMNP, all HMNPs exhibited significantly greater antibacterial activity against a gram-positive bacterium, B.cereus, compared to vancomycin alone. Such efficacy establishes the HMNPs as potential transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) in the treatment of gram-positive bacteria-induced diseases such as cellulitis, folliculitis, etc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41961464What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.