Observational studyUpdates in surgery2026
Standardized handover improves trauma team communication: evidence from a level I Trauma Center in Italy.
Observational study in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Standardized handover improves trauma team communication: evidence from a level I Trauma Center in Italy.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective communication during trauma handover is critical to ensuring continuity and quality of care. The ATMIST framework offers a standardized format for transferring essential patient information between pre-hospital and hospital teams. To quantify the concordance between information transmitted by emergency medical services (EMS) and data documented during in-hospital trauma handovers using the ATMIST protocol at a Level I Trauma Center in Italy. We conducted a prospective observational study of trauma patients admitted between December 2023 and May 2024. Variables analyzed included demographics, mechanism of injury, vital signs, suspected injuries, and pre-hospital interventions. Concordance was defined as the presence of matching information in both pre-hospital and in-hospital records. We calculated absolute agreement percentages and unweighted Cohen's kappa coefficients to assess inter-observer agreement. Of 118 trauma patients evaluated, 85 met inclusion criteria. The overall mean absolute agreement across all variables was 74.5% (± 12.7). The highest concordance was observed for endotracheal intubation (95.5%, κ = 0.87) and patient age (94.3%, κ = 0.68). The lowest agreement was found for time of injury (κ = 0.10) and triage priority (κ = 0.12), indicating substantial variability in the transmission of time-sensitive and prioritization data. Structured handover using the ATMIST framework reliability conveyed critical clinical interventions and core patient characteristics. However, logistical and prioritization elements showed poor concordance, representing key targets for system improvement. Standardized training and the integration of digital handover tools may further enhance communication accuracy and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41961459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.