ArticleMolecular diversity2026
Predictive bioactivity modeling and structural binding analysis for the identification of potential SMYD3 modulators.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SMYD3 is a lysine methyltransferase involved in epigenetic regulation and oncogenic transcription, making it an attractive yet challenging therapeutic target. This study presents an integrated computational workflow combining machine learning based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modelling, external bioactivity prediction, molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and network analysis to prioritize potential SMYD3 inhibitors. ML-QSAR models were constructed using multiple molecular descriptor representations and regression algorithms. A MACCS fingerprint-based Random Forest model showed the most reliable external predictivity, supported by cross-validation, applicability domain assessment, and Y-randomization analysis. Feature interpretability using SHAP highlighted a small set of chemically meaningful structural patterns that consistently influenced activity prediction. The validated model was then applied to an external compound library, and bioactivity was predicted only for compounds lying within the defined applicability domain. This screening enabled the prioritization of in-domain candidates with moderate predicted potency and acceptable structural coverage relative to the training space. Structure-based evaluation using the crystallographic SMYD3 structure demonstrated that selected compounds bind within the experimentally validated active site and engage key residues observed in the co-crystal complex. Extended 250 ns MD simulations indicated that CHEMBL4472528 maintained stable binding, persistent polar and hydrophobic interactions, and favorable binding free energies compared with both the co-crystal ligand and other screened candidates. Network and pathway analysis further placed SMYD3 within a focused chromatin-associated and transcriptional regulatory context, supporting the biological relevance of the target. This work provides a reproducible computational framework for SMYD3 inhibitor prioritization and highlights CHEMBL4472528 as a promising scaffold for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41961390What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.