SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026
Overview of dual console robotic training for surgical residents: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual-console robotic systems represent a paradigm shift in surgical education, allowing real-time shared control and instructor intervention. Although increasingly adopted, their impact across specialties, educational effectiveness, and implementation barriers are not fully established. To perform a systematic review to provide a comprehensive overview of dual – console training in robotic surgery by synthesizing available evidence regarding training outcomes, implementation strategies, educational effectiveness, and the broader impact of dual – console systems on surgical education and surgical performance. A systematic search was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. Descriptive statistics were recorded and analysed using SPSS v26.0. Overall, 12 studies including 1,267 participants were included. These included residents from gynecology, urology, colorectal surgery, general surgery, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Dual consoles consistently increased trainee operative exposure, autonomy scores, and skill acquisition, with improvements in suturing times and procedural step completion. Safety outcomes were preserved or improved, however operative efficiency varied with some studies demonstrating reduced operative times, while others reported neutral or slightly prolonged procedures due to greater trainee participation. Trainee and instructor satisfaction was uniformly high, citing improved communication, confidence, and educational quality. Implementation barriers included cost, curriculum integration, and faculty development needs. Dual-console systems significantly enhance robotic surgical training by improving technical skill acquisition, trainee engagement, and perceived educational quality, while maintaining patient safety. Operative efficiency outcomes are variable and context-dependent. Despite clear educational advantages, widespread adoption is limited by financial and curricular barriers. Future efforts should focus upon the integration of dual-console training into surgical training curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.