Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41961368›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2026

Radiotherapy strategies for nonagenarian cancer patients at a tertiary cancer center.

Kae Okuma, Ayaka Nagao, Koji Inaba, Tairo Kashihara, Kana Takahashi, Madoka Sakuramachi, Akane Yoshiba, Akikazu Kobori, Shoki Nakamura, Hiroshi Igaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kae OkumaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan. kokuma@ncc.go.jp.
Ayaka NagaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji InabaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan.
Tairo KashiharaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan.
Kana TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan.
Madoka SakuramachiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan.
Akane YoshibaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan.
Akikazu KoboriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoki NakamuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi IgakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, 104-0045, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith increasing life expectancy, the clinical role of radiotherapy in cancer patients aged ≥ 90 years warrants systematic evaluation. This study aimed to assess treatment patterns, safety, and outcomes of radiotherapy in the super-elderly at a tertiary cancer center.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 119 patients aged ≥ 90 years who underwent radiotherapy between 2007 and 2025. Patient characteristics, treatment modalities, adverse events, and survival were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.

resultsThe median age was 91 years, and 71% of patients had ECOG performance status (PS) 0–1. Radiotherapy was delivered with curative intent in 69% of cases. Advanced techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and brachytherapy (BT) were used in 59% of patients. Hypofractionated schedules (≤ 10 fractions) were applied in 66% of cases. Treatment completion rate was 95%, with grade ≥ 3 adverse events observed in only 3% of patients. Median overall survival was 31.2 months. On multivariate analysis, PS was the only independent prognostic factor for survival.

conclusionRadiotherapy for patients aged ≥ 90 years can be delivered safely and effectively in appropriately selected individuals, particularly when utilizing tailored approaches such as SRT, IMRT, or BT. Even among patients treated with palliative intent, meaningful local control and symptom relief were achievable. These findings suggest that chronological age alone should not preclude the use of radiotherapy; however, clinical decisions should be guided by individual patient factors such as performance status, functional reserve, and overall clinical context.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyNonagenarianRadiation therapyStereotactic radiotherapySuper-elderlyTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID41961368
PMCPMC13199532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.