ArticleFolia microbiologica2026
Targeted delivery of postbiotics: oral, intradermal, and intravenous models.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The helpful gut microbes create bioactive micro- and macromolecules known as postbiotics, which have substantial medical potential. These small-molecular-weight biomolecules, which provide the host with a number of physiological health advantages, are the subject of a revolutionary therapeutic strategy. Because of their varied delivery mechanisms and customizable dosage, several postbiotics are promising medical agents that may be used for both prophylactic and therapeutic purposes. Nonetheless, there are still a lot of obstacles to overcome when giving postbiotics in vivo. The current body of scientific literature supports utilizing targeted delivery systems based on nanoparticles as a novel and secure method for the delivery or/and release of postbiotics in a variety of (oral, intradermal, and intravenous) in vivo models due to their attractive characteristics in regards to low toxicity, high biodegradability, biocompatibility, and considerable capacity for carrying both hydrophobic and hydrophilic postbiotics. If postbiotics are to be widely used as therapeutic approaches, they must undergo considerable research and randomized double-blind clinical studies because they are still in the early stages of development. This article gives a thorough summary of the newest developments in drug delivery, with a focus on the main in vivo routes for the tailored delivery of postbiotics. However, the findings summarized in this review are primarily based on preclinical and early-stage studies, and limitations related to heterogeneous study designs, incomplete pharmacokinetic characterization, and limited clinical validation should be considered when interpreting the translational potential of postbiotic delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41961362What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.