ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2026
Analysis of individual identification and age-class classification of wild female macaque vocalizations without pitch- and formant-based acoustic parameter measurements.
Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, deep learning has achieved high performance in bioacoustic classification tasks by leveraging automatically processed acoustic features for large datasets. However, few performance evaluations of automatically processed acoustic features have been conducted on small-scale data because deep learning requires large datasets. To test whether mel spectrograms (automatically processed acoustic features) are effective for classifying relatively small acoustic data, we evaluated the performance of two classification machines (random forest and support vector machine) using mel-spectrograms of 651 coo calls of six wild female Japanese macaques on two tasks: 1) individual identification and 2) age-class classification between younger (< 10 yrs) and the older animals (> 20 yrs). For the individual identification task, the mean balanced accuracy was 0.81 for random forest and 0.82 for support vector machine. For the age-class classification task, the mean balanced accuracy was 0.91 for random forest and 0.93 for support vector machine. Considering that of all the calls were recorded in the wild, methods using automatically processed acoustic features, such as mel spectrogram, are effective in classifying small acoustic data for the individual identification task. The high performance in the age-class classification task might be attributable to the potential of mel spectrograms to capture the characteristics of older individuals (e.g. harshness).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41961349What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.