ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2026
Prediction of chemoresistance in ovarian cancer based on deep learning with pathological images.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background. High‑grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is a lethal disease marked by frequent platinum‑based chemotherapy resistance, resulting in high recurrence and mortality. Methods. Whole‑slide images (WSIs) and clinical data were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas and our institutional database. After segmenting WSIs and discarding non‑informative tiles, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to classify cancer versus normal tissue and to predict drug response. Clinical variables were integrated and feature selection performed using Lasso, AdaBoost, Naive Bayes, XGBoost and Random Forest, with the best‑performing model identified on validation and test sets. Resistance scores derived from the optimal model were correlated with clinicopathologic factors, and associations between individual features and lymphocyte infiltration were examined; key features were validated pathologically. Results. The CNN achieved an AUC of 0.995 for tumor‑normal discrimination and 0.662 for distinguishing resistant from sensitive tiles. All five machine‑learning models yielded area under the curves (AUCs) ≥ 0.90 for histologic features. Lasso performed best (AUC = 0.993) and selected 85 significant features. Higher resistance scores correlated positively with tumor grade and stage, negatively with silent mutation burden and neoantigen load, and positively with lymphocyte infiltration, especially feature TZ0279. Patients in the resistant group showed significantly poorer overall and disease‑free survival. Conclusion. A deep‑learning pipeline based on pathology images accurately separates tumor from normal tissue in HGSOC, and also has preliminary potential in predicting chemotherapy response. Histopathological features derived from Lasso regression can initially reflect the tumor microenvironment and drug resistance, offering potential biomarkers for prognosis and personalized therapy. This supports the feasibility of applying image-based artificial intelligence technologies to clinical decision-making research.Clinical trial number. Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41961331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.