ArticleParasitology research2026
Molecular validation and redescription of Glypthelmins staffordi (Digenea: Plagiorchiidae) with an updated key to genus Glypthelmins Stafford, 1905.
Article in Parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glypthelmins is a genus comprising species that parasitize anurans and has been reported in America and Asia. The taxonomic history of the genus Glypthelmins is problematic, involving the reclassification of species into other genera. Glypthelmins staffordi was consequently not considered a valid species in Glypthelmins due to morphological differences and was placed in the genus Rauschiella. Thus, the valid name of G. staffordi prior to this work is R. staffordi. Moreover, no molecular data has been published for R. staffordi. To address this gap, a morphological redescription of G. staffordi is provided, along with the confirmation of the phylogenetic placement of G. staffordi in genus Glypthelmins using three genetic markers. Morphological comparisons were conducted with eight other Glypthelmins species, and the molecular phylogeny revealed that the G. staffordi specimens form a monophyletic group with other Glypthelmins. Glypthelmins staffordi was also evidenced to be genetically distant from genus Rauschiella. Thus, G. staffordi is proposed to be reinstated as a valid species within the genus Glypthelmins, instead of in Rauschiella. Additionally, the morphological character of the excretory vesicle should not be used as a key character to distinguish among genera. Supplementing the systematics of this taxonomically complex group, we provide an updated key for the genus Glypthelmins, alongside molecular sequences of G. staffordi, to supplement the identification of Glypthelmins species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.