ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Diagnostic evaluation of renal masses in chronic kidney disease: a clinical and radiologic challenge.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of pseudocapsule status in localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly with long-term dialysis exposure and acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD). At the same time, CKD-related architectural distortion and hypoperfusion reduce lesion conspicuity on ultrasound and weaken enhancement-based interpretation on CT and MRI. In advanced CKD, restrictions on iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast agents further increase the proportion of renal masses that remain indeterminate after conventional imaging. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) addresses the key unmet need in this setting: a safe, direct assessment of microvascular perfusion. Microbubble agents are purely intravascular and non-nephrotoxic, enabling use across all CKD stages and in dialysis patients. By showing real-time enhancement of septa, wall thickening and mural nodules, CEUS distinguishes vascular tumour components from avascular hemorrhagic or proteinaceous material that can mimic enhancement on CT/DECT or signal abnormalities on non-contrast MRI. This capability supports a CEUS-adapted Bosniak approach: lesion categorization is driven by enhancement of septa, wall and nodules rather than by attenuation or T1 hyperintensity of cyst contents, helping avoid misclassification in ACKD. We propose a structured workflow that integrates the triad of CKD stage/eGFR, dialysis status and ACKD with pre- and post-CEUS Bosniak assessment to guide follow-up versus biopsy or nephron-sparing treatment. This article is a narrative review of the literature, complemented by an illustrative clinical case which demonstrates how CEUS can resolve ambiguity when CT/DECT and non-contrast MRI remain inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.