Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41961317›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS nonradiation treatment response assessment: applications, challenges, and future directions.

David T Fetzer, Yuko Kono, Fabio Piscaglia, Christoph F Dietrich, Franca Meloni, Qiang Lu, Dirk-Andre Clevert, Andrej Lyshchik, Yasunori Minami, Jeong Min Lee and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

David T FetzerDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA. david.fetzer@utsouthwestern.edu.
Yuko KonoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Fabio PiscagliaDivision of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Christoph F DietrichDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Franca MeloniInterventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Casa di Cura Igea Milano, Milan, Italy.
Qiang LuWest China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dirk-Andre ClevertDepartment of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, University of Munich Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Andrej LyshchikDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.
Yasunori MinamiKindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Jeong Min LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae Kyoung KimDepartment of Radiology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Hyun-Jung JangDepartment of Radiology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Masatoshi KudoKindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Stephanie R WilsonDepartment of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requires nuanced treatment response assessment to balance oncologic control with preservation of liver function. CT and MRI, cornerstones of response evaluation, are often limited by contraindications to their use or indeterminate findings. The recently introduced ACR LI-RADS Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Non-Radiation Treatment Response Assessment (TRA) algorithm offers a real-time, radiation-free alternative for evaluating treated HCC after ablation, transarterial therapies, or surgical resection. This review summarizes the CEUS TRA lexicon, criteria, and application across common clinical scenarios, emphasizing its value as a troubleshooting tool when conventional imaging is non-evaluable due to artifacts, contrast limitations, or heterogeneous post-treatment changes. We highlight pitfalls unique to CEUS interpretation, including poor lesion visibility, resection cavity complexity, and the inability to assess extrahepatic disease. Emerging areas include CEUS assessment after radiation-based therapies and the potential for integration of Kupffer-cell-specific contrast agents. Together, these developments position CEUS as an increasingly important modality for precise, timely, and individualized management of HCC following non-radiation locoregional therapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaImage EnhancementLiver NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID41961317
PMCPMC13577986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.