ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS nonradiation treatment response assessment: applications, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requires nuanced treatment response assessment to balance oncologic control with preservation of liver function. CT and MRI, cornerstones of response evaluation, are often limited by contraindications to their use or indeterminate findings. The recently introduced ACR LI-RADS Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Non-Radiation Treatment Response Assessment (TRA) algorithm offers a real-time, radiation-free alternative for evaluating treated HCC after ablation, transarterial therapies, or surgical resection. This review summarizes the CEUS TRA lexicon, criteria, and application across common clinical scenarios, emphasizing its value as a troubleshooting tool when conventional imaging is non-evaluable due to artifacts, contrast limitations, or heterogeneous post-treatment changes. We highlight pitfalls unique to CEUS interpretation, including poor lesion visibility, resection cavity complexity, and the inability to assess extrahepatic disease. Emerging areas include CEUS assessment after radiation-based therapies and the potential for integration of Kupffer-cell-specific contrast agents. Together, these developments position CEUS as an increasingly important modality for precise, timely, and individualized management of HCC following non-radiation locoregional therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.