ReviewMycorrhiza2026
Inoculation is more effective for main crops than for preceding cover crops and does not affect the arbuscular mycorrhizal community in no-till vegetable systems.
Review in Mycorrhiza, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) establish symbioses with most terrestrial plants, enhancing nutrient uptake, stress tolerance, and soil quality. We evaluated the use of Rhizophagus irregularis-based inoculants in cover crops and subsequent commercial crops in a no-till system and assessed their effects on soil biological attributes and crop yield. Three on-farm field experiments in different locations were conducted with common bean, okra, and corn cultivated after the winter cover crops. The assays were arranged in a randomized complete block design with a split-plot scheme and four replicates, with cover crop inoculation (black oats) as the main factor and crop inoculation in the subplot. The treatments included (i) inoculation in the cover crop and no inoculation in the main crop; (ii) no inoculation in the cover crop and inoculation in the main crop; (iii) inoculation in both crops; and (iv) no inoculation in either crop. Soil acid phosphatase activity, fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis, AMF spore density, and crop yield were measured at the end of each cycle, and the AMF community composition was characterized. The AMF inoculant increased the soil quality indicators (acid phosphatase activity and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis). Inoculation of the cover crops did not replace the beneficial effects of direct inoculation on the yields of beans, okra, or corn. The results of the experiments in locations with different soils revealed that, overall, direct crop inoculation increased the yields of bean, okra, and corn by 30%, 33%, and 19%, respectively, and intensified soil enzyme activity, with no detectable effects on soil AMF community diversity or structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.