Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41961301›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2026

Accommodation of Biodiversity in Swedish Municipalities. A National Survey.

Lisbet Christoffersen, Jan-Eric Englund, Thomas Randrup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisbet ChristoffersenSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden. lisbet.christoffersen@slu.se.
Jan-Eric EnglundSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Thomas RandrupSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.

Funding

Formas 2021-01419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habitat networks for biodiversity are increasingly degraded and fragmented. This study investigates how Swedish municipal landscape managers accommodate biodiversity in urban and peri-urban landscapes, with particular attention to the promotion of 'wilder landscapes'. We explore their view of nature as related to wilder landscapes too. Drawing on a national survey with responses from 70% of all Swedish municipalities, we analyse how biodiversity initiatives are prioritised, organised, and implemented within local governments. The survey reveals a strong interest in biodiversity accommodation, reflected in a wide range of strategies and concrete actions. However, organisational constraints, limited political support, and funding shortages often result in fragmented and ad hoc approaches. Competing agendas, as expressed in different views of nature as well as in bound tasks of the public managers, may shape future directions in municipal landscape management, especially those emphasising multifunctional green spaces. We discuss the implications of municipal organisational structures, managerial perspectives, individual views of nature and institutional frameworks for biodiversity accommodation and offer projections for future municipal biodiversity strategies in Sweden.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesCitiesEcosystemLocal GovernmentSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedendiscoursesmanagement trendsorganisationViews of nature

Identifiers

PMID41961301
PMCPMC13068711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.