Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41961296›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2026

Plasma neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein in the differential diagnosis of acute vertigo in the emergency department.

Melanie Haidegger, Natalie Berger, Simon Fandler-Höfler, Lukas Gattermeyer-Kell, Isra Hatab, Markus Kneihsl, Sebastian Monsberger, Tobias Niedrist, Cansu Tafrali, Maria Martinez-Serrat and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Melanie HaideggerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Natalie BergerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Simon Fandler-HöflerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Lukas Gattermeyer-KellDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Isra HatabDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Markus KneihslDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sebastian MonsbergerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Tobias NiedristClinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Cansu TafraliDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Maria Martinez-SerratDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Pascal BenkertMultiple Sclerosis Centre and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience (RC2NB), Neurology, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jens KuhleMultiple Sclerosis Centre and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience (RC2NB), Neurology, Departments of Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian EnzingerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Michael KhalilDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Thomas GattringerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. thomas.gattringer@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-6576

Funding

Austrian Science Fund KLI 995 B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistinguishing posterior circulation stroke (PCS) from peripheral or other causes of acute vertigo can be challenging. Blood biomarkers, such as plasma neurofilament light chain (pNfL) and glial acidic fibrillary protein (pGFAP), have been associated with (even small) stroke lesions and could support patient selection for neuroimaging and inpatient evaluation in acute vertigo.

methodsThis prospective study included consecutive patients presenting with acute vertigo to a neurological emergency department. All patients received neurological examination, laboratory testing and neuroimaging. pNfL and pGFAP were measured using Single Molecule Array (SIMOA) technique. pNfL and pGFAP levels were compared between PCS and patients with non-central vertigo.

results102 patients were included (mean age 57.9 years, 57.8% female). pNfL Z-scores were higher in PCS compared to non-central vertigo patients (median 2.1, IQR = 1.5 versus 0.7, IQR = 1.9; p = 0.004). pNfL Z-score ≥ 1.0 was associated with PCS (OR 8.8, 95% CI 2.4-32.7), yielding a sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 62.4% and negative predictive value of 94.6%. pGFAP Z-scores were higher in PCS patients than in non-central vertigo patients (median 1.3, IQR = 2.8 versus 0.6, IQR = 1.5; p = 0.016). pGFAP Z-score ≥ 1.0 was associated with PCS (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.8), yielding a sensitivity of 57.9%, specificity of 71.8% and negative predictive value of 88.4%. Respective associations remained robust after correcting for symptom duration. DISCUSSION: pNfL and pGFAP levels were higher in PCS compared to patients with non-central causes of vertigo. With its high negative predictive value, pNfL appears especially clinically useful to rule out PCS in acute vertigo.

Indexed as

Glial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinNeurofilament ProteinsStrokeVertigoAgedBiomarkersDiagnosis, DifferentialEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic Proteinneurofilament protein LNeurofilament ProteinsBlood biomarkerGlial acidic fibrillary proteinNeurofilament light chainStrokeVertigo

Identifiers

PMID41961296
PMCPMC13068737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.