ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Plasma neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein in the differential diagnosis of acute vertigo in the emergency department.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDistinguishing posterior circulation stroke (PCS) from peripheral or other causes of acute vertigo can be challenging. Blood biomarkers, such as plasma neurofilament light chain (pNfL) and glial acidic fibrillary protein (pGFAP), have been associated with (even small) stroke lesions and could support patient selection for neuroimaging and inpatient evaluation in acute vertigo.
methodsThis prospective study included consecutive patients presenting with acute vertigo to a neurological emergency department. All patients received neurological examination, laboratory testing and neuroimaging. pNfL and pGFAP were measured using Single Molecule Array (SIMOA) technique. pNfL and pGFAP levels were compared between PCS and patients with non-central vertigo.
results102 patients were included (mean age 57.9 years, 57.8% female). pNfL Z-scores were higher in PCS compared to non-central vertigo patients (median 2.1, IQR = 1.5 versus 0.7, IQR = 1.9; p = 0.004). pNfL Z-score ≥ 1.0 was associated with PCS (OR 8.8, 95% CI 2.4-32.7), yielding a sensitivity of 84.2%, specificity of 62.4% and negative predictive value of 94.6%. pGFAP Z-scores were higher in PCS patients than in non-central vertigo patients (median 1.3, IQR = 2.8 versus 0.6, IQR = 1.5; p = 0.016). pGFAP Z-score ≥ 1.0 was associated with PCS (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.8), yielding a sensitivity of 57.9%, specificity of 71.8% and negative predictive value of 88.4%. Respective associations remained robust after correcting for symptom duration. DISCUSSION: pNfL and pGFAP levels were higher in PCS compared to patients with non-central causes of vertigo. With its high negative predictive value, pNfL appears especially clinically useful to rule out PCS in acute vertigo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.