ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Sexual Function After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIs): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of sexual function after obstetric anal sphincter injury: a 12-year follow-up cohort study.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) may lead to life changing sequelae.
objectiveThe aim was to determine whether sustaining an OASI independently influences postpartum sexual function. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched (inception to 12 July 2024) for eligible studies comparing women who had undergone vaginal delivery with and without OASI. Two reviewers screened, extracted data and assessed risk of bias with JBI/CASP checklists. Pooled effects were calculated with DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models; heterogeneity was explored with I
resultsTwenty-two studies met inclusion criteria; no meta-analysis pooled more than six studies, yielding low-certainty evidence. Exploratory pooled estimates suggested women with an OASI were 30% less likely to be sexually active at 3 months postpartum [RR 0.69 (95% CI 0.49-0.95), p = 0.03] and more likely to suffer from dyspareunia at 3 months [RR 1.58 (95% CI 1.14-2.17), p = 0.005] and > 12 months postpartum [RR 1.69 (95% CI 1.31-2.17), p < 0.001] when compared to the control group. FSFI outcomes were sparsely reported and largely derived from single studies; limited data suggested lower domain scores at 2 and 12 months among women with OASI.
conclusionAvailable evidence is observational, heterogeneous and frequently lacks baseline sexual function assessment, substantially limiting causal inference. Quantitative findings should therefore be interpreted as exploratory. High-quality, baseline-controlled prospective studies using standardised outcome measures are needed. In the interim, proactive enquiry during the postnatal follow-up of OASI patients represents a low-risk, patient-centred approach to addressing under-reported sexual health concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41961294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.