ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Intra-arterial chemoperfusion for breast cancer brain metastases: safety and efficacy.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study presents a retrospective analysis of palliative intra-arterial chemoperfusion (IAC) for patients with symptomatic breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) aiming to investigate the safety and efficacy of the treatment.
methodsThirteen patients with BCBM were treated using a total of 64 IACs, averaging 4.9 per patient. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Response to IAC was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1.
resultsThere were no treatment-related major complications. A total of three patients (3/11) developed progressive disease. Five (5/11) patients achieved stable disease, two (2/11) partial response, and one (1/11) complete response, resulting in a local tumor control rate of 73% (8/11). Two (2/13) patients could not be evaluated according to RECIST 1.1. The median OS time was 8.2 months (95% CI: 7.7-8.7), and the median PFS time was 7.9 months (95% CI: 0.0-16.3). The mean OS time was 14.5 months (95% CI: 3.4-25.6), and the mean PFS time was 10.6 months (95% CI: 2.6-18.6).
conclusionIAC can be applied as a safe method for palliative patients with BCBM. Further studies are necessary to definitively determine its efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41961288What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.