Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41961283›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2026

Standardizing ischemic preconditioning research in applied exercise physiology.

Moacir Marocolo, Rodrigo Hohl, Michal Wilk, Gustavo R Mota, Hiago L R Souza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moacir MarocoloIntegrated Laboratory of Physiology and Performance (LABIFID), Department of Biophysics and Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil. isamjf@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7715-2534
Rodrigo HohlIntegrated Laboratory of Physiology and Performance (LABIFID), Department of Biophysics and Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3194-9289
Michal WilkInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5799-6337
Gustavo R MotaExercise Science, Health and Human Performance Research Group, Department of Sport Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6109-0658
Hiago L R SouzaIntegrated Laboratory of Physiology and Performance (LABIFID), Department of Biophysics and Physiology, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2488-7502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on ischemic preconditioning (IPC) within applied exercise physiology has expanded considerably over the past few decades. While IPC demonstrates potential for enhancing exercise performance and accelerating muscle recovery, its widespread adoption is currently hindered by substantial heterogeneity in protocols and applications. Notably, recent evidence suggests that the reported ergogenic effects of IPC become less apparent in studies utilizing a three-arm experimental design (i.e., IPC, placebo and control). This variability compromises reproducibility and complicates the establishment of IPC as a reliable physiological stimulus and an ergogenic aid. Consequently, this narrative review aims to advance the field by identifying gaps, proposing methodological standards and encouraging the standardization of protocol design. We evaluate critical parameters, including cuff width, inflation pressure, number of cycles, and the duration of occlusion and reperfusion, while addressing the implications of experimental design and the confounding influence of placebo effects. As significant questions remain regarding the optimization of IPC for physical work capacity and muscle recovery, a standardized framework is urgently required to guide future research and evidence-based practice in human performance physiology.

Indexed as

ExerciseIschemic PreconditioningMuscle, SkeletalHumansPost-Exercise RecoveryResearch DesignIschemiaPerformance-enhancing substancesPlacebo effectResearch designTourniquets

Identifiers

PMID41961283
PMCPMC13287253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.