ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Challenges in tracer development for tumor microenvironment (TME) imaging.
Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular imaging of the tumor microenvironment (TME) has emerged as a powerful approach to non-invasively interrogate immune cell composition, activation state and functional dynamics, thereby addressing key limitations of biopsy-based biomarkers in immuno-oncology. Early clinical successes, particularly in immune checkpoint and CD8⁺ T-cell imaging, underscore the translational potential of this strategy. However, the development of robust and clinically relevant TME-targeted radiopharmaceuticals is confronted with a distinct set of biological, technical and methodological challenges that fundamentally differentiate it from classical tumor imaging. These include low and dynamic target expression, tight coupling between tracer affinity, molar activity and receptor occupancy, limited suitability of standard in vitro assays, increasing complexity of in vivo models, and heightened vulnerability to pitfalls in image interpretation and quantification.This review provides a comprehensive analysis of these challenges across the tracer development pipeline, spanning target selection, molecular format choice, radiochemistry, preclinical evaluation and data analysis. Rather than representing prohibitive obstacles, these limitations delineate the biological and technical boundary conditions within which TME imaging strategies must be developed and interpreted. Emerging solutions include the growing role of peptides and engineered antibody fragments, stepwise and question-driven evaluation workflows, harmonized preclinical models and integrated targeting concepts that align biological relevance with technical feasibility. Together, these considerations provide a framework for sustainable and translational progress in TME imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.