Observational studyCerebellum (London, England)2026
RFC1-related disorders: A case series of 4-aminopyridine and acetyl-DL-leucine treatment.
Observational study in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This observational case series summarizes clinical experiences with 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and acetyl-DL-leucine (ADLL) in patients with RFC1-related disorders treated under named patient use conditions. Clinical data from 30 patients treated at four university centers in Germany, Switzerland, and France were analyzed. Except for three patients previously enrolled in the ALCAT randomized crossover trial, treatments were initiated as part of routine care and were not standardized for dose or duration. Analyses were based on medical records, including patient-reported outcomes and physician assessments. Four patients from Strasbourg underwent SARA and SDFS assessments before and during treatment; SARA total scores for three ALCAT participants were obtained from the original study dataset. Twelve patients received 4-AP only, seven ADLL only, and eleven both treatments at different time points. Median treatment duration was 29 days for 4-AP and 53 days for ADLL. Subjective improvement was reported in 3/22 patients (13.6%) treated with 4-AP and 3/15 (20.0%) treated with ADLL. Objective gait improvement was observed in 2/13 patients (15.4%) on 4-AP and in 2/10 (20.0%) on ADLL. No effects on downbeat nystagmus were observed. Exploratory analyses revealed no significant differences in SARA total scores between ADLL and placebo or baseline; neither SARA nor SDFS scores improved in Strasbourg patients. Responses to 4-AP and ADLL in RFC1-related disorders were rare and limited, suggesting that neurodegenerative dysfunction of cerebellar circuits in RFC1-disease—in contrast to certain genetic cerebellar disorders such as SCA27B—is unlikely to be improved to clinically relevant thresholds by these agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.