ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Human health risks of potentially toxic elements in the soil-crop system of a coal mining area, Moatize, Mozambique.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the pathways by which potentially toxic elements (PTEs) enter the environment during coal mining activities in Moatize, Mozambique. Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) and Ion Chromatography (IC), samples of coal (n = 11), soil (n = 18), sediment (n = 4), and food crops (n = 15) were analysed. Results confirm significant accumulation of PTEs in coal. Environmental contamination is evident, as mean concentrations of Al, Co, Fe, and Mn in soil and sediments surpass the standards established by the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO). In crops, Cr (0.92-4.16 mg/kg) and Ni (0.47-1.18 mg/kg) exceeded the permissible limit (0.1 mg/kg) in 60% of samples. Enrichment factors (EF > 2) for As, Co, and Ni indicate an attribution to anthropogenic activity, whereas an extreme ecological risk (Er > 320) for As and Co suggests that mining activities are the predominant sources. The Toxicity Risk Index (TRI) indicates higher ecological stress in soils (65% high TRI) than sediments, primarily due to As and Cr toxicity. Human health assessments confirmed non-carcinogenic risks, with Hazard quotients (HQ > 1.0) for Al, Mn, and Fe in adults and Al and Fe in children. Bioaccumulation factors were higher in Cowpea than Zea mays, posing a greater risk to consumers of local food crops. Although the cumulative hazard index (HI) for Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn remained low, Cr posed the highest carcinogenic risk, especially for adults. These findings emphasise the importance of regular monitoring and sustainable land-use practices to reduce ecological and human health risks and safeguard the Moatize ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.