Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41961131›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Finding normo: reporting values for the SRS22r score in healthy sport-active children.

Frederik Damsgaard Højsager, Niels Wedderkopp, Luise Borch, Rene Castelein, Ane Simony

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frederik Damsgaard HøjsagerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark. frederik.hojsager@rsyd.dk.
Niels WedderkoppClinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Luise BorchDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent medicine, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Rene CasteleinDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ane SimonyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionScoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) is a disease-specific measure of quality of life in patients diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). When answering the SRS-22r, patients answer 22 questions with scores 1–5, 1 corresponding to the worst possible option, and 5 to the best. It is validated in children with scoliosis > 10 years. Low SRS-22r scores have been suggested to serve as an indicator for considering surgical intervention along with a progression in Cobb angle. However, there are only few studies on SRS-22r scores among children without spine conditions, making the impact of a spine condition on the health-related quality of life scores in adolescents and teenagers difficult to assess. Since surgical treatment of progressive curves is often performed before age 16, normative data for this age group are essential. The aim therefore was to estimate normative data on children under 16 years of age and to assess what influenced the scores in otherwise healthy children without AIS.

methodIn total, 264 children, attending a sports-focused public school, were invited to answer the SRS-22r questionnaire and self-reported Tanner stage. 110 children (70 girls) answered the questionnaire, all but one reporting tanner stage as well. All students who received the questionnaire underwent a spine examination performed by a physiotherapist student.

resultsThe participants had a median age of 12 years [Interquartile range (IQR): 11;14]; most were reporting Tanner stages 3 or 4, although 27.5% of the boys reported stage 5. The median scores of mental health and self-image were 4.0 [IQR: 3.6; 4.4] and 4.2 [IQR: 3.8; 4.4], with boys reporting higher scores in both domains compared to girls. Among all children, the median pain reported was 4.2 [IQR: 3.8;4.6] with no sex difference. The differences between the genders were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Ordinal logistic regression showed that lower pain levels and male sex predicted better mental health and self-image, while higher Tanner stages correlated with poorer outcomes. Interestingly, three boys aged 11 reported Tanner Stage 5, highlighting potential inaccuracies in self-reported data and the need for assisted reporting in body composition questionnaires.

conclusionThis study highlights the importance of normative data, revealing that active children without scoliosis report pain and issues with mental health and self-image, when addressed with the SRS-22r. In particular, the SRS-22r scores in this cohort were lower than those found in previous studies of children with scoliosis, highlighting the challenges of interpreting and potentially using the SRS-22r results in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Back healthy populationCohort specific dataDanish public school dataMental healthSRS22r

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.