ReviewJournal of neurology2026
Non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of primary mitochondrial diseases.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CHCHD3(MIC19): mitochondrial cristae structure regulation and disease associations.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary mitochondrial diseases (PMDs) represent a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by impaired oxidative phosphorylation and multisystem involvement, commonly affecting the nervous system. As therapeutic development accelerates, there is a growing need for robust biomarkers capable of supporting diagnosis, stratifying patient subgroups, monitoring disease progression, and providing sensitive pharmacodynamic readouts for clinical trials. This review summarizes recent advances in three major non-invasive biomarker domains relevant to PMDs: circulating serum and molecular biomarkers, functional and digital endpoints, and neuroimaging modalities. Circulating markers, such as FGF21, GDF15, NfL, and NAD⁺-related signatures, have each been proposed for diagnosis and to follow disease progression, while multi-omics approaches are paving the way toward integrated molecular phenotyping. Digital health technologies, including accelerometry and gait analytics, enable objective quantification of real-world functional impairment, although disease-specific validation remains an unmet need. Neuroimaging offers mechanistic insights through metabolic (MRS, CEST), perfusion (ASL), and molecular modalities (mitochondrial PET tracers). Cutting-edge tools, such as Multi-Spectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT), Raman spectroscopy, and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), promise real-time or spatially resolved assessment of mitochondrial function. Together, these developments outline multidimensional biomarker approaches for PMDs, with the potential to directly measure target engagement and clinically meaningful phenotypes in future therapeutic trials. Future progress will depend on longitudinal validation, harmonized acquisition protocols, and the integration of multimodal platforms to support upcoming therapeutic trials and precision medicine strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.