SynthesisPediatric radiology2026
Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted infant hip ultrasound interpretation for developmental dysplasia of the hip: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound is the standard imaging test for infant developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) but is highly operator-dependent, leading to variable image quality and classification. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted ultrasound may standardize acquisition and interpretation and support DDH screening beyond specialist centers.
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of AI-assisted ultrasound for infant DDH. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a systematic review and diagnostic test-accuracy meta-analysis of studies enrolling infants (≤12 months) undergoing hip ultrasound, in which the index test was AI applied to two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound and the reference standard was expert Graf-based interpretation or follow-up consensus. Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2 (diagnostic accuracy bias tool). Sensitivity and specificity were pooled with a bivariate random-effects model.
resultsTwenty-nine studies were eligible; nine provided 2×2 data (6,351 hips) for pooling. Pooled sensitivity was 0.92 (95% CI 0.86-0.95) and specificity 0.96 (95% CI 0.91-0.98). Risk of bias was frequently high or unclear for patient selection and the index test. Feasibility signals included short operator training times (approx. 1-2 h) and scan acquisition time reductions (approx. 20-50%), while economic reporting was limited.
conclusionAI-assisted ultrasound demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for infant DDH and may help standardize hip imaging and facilitate safe use by nonexpert operators, but larger multicenter studies with external validation and robust economic evaluation are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41961108What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.