Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41961088›Full record

ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026

Diagnostic performance of lumbar computed tomography Hounsfield unit thresholds for osteoporosis and osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Omar Lubbad, Akram Hagos, Laila Lubbad, Yahya El-Tahlawy, Giuseppe Lambros Morassi, Nektarios K Mazarakis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omar LubbadBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. O.lubbad1@uni.bsms.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0402-5610
Akram HagosBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Laila LubbadRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical School, Busaiteen, Bahrain.
Yahya El-TahlawyBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Giuseppe Lambros MorassiRoyal Sussex County Hospital Department of Neurosurgery, Brighton, UK.
Nektarios K MazarakisRoyal Sussex County Hospital Department of Neurosurgery, Brighton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebral Hounsfield units (HU) measured on routine computed tomography (CT) have emerged as an accessible surrogate for bone mineral density (BMD), yet reported diagnostic thresholds vary widely. This meta-analysis aimed to define and test unified HU cut-offs for identifying osteopenia and osteoporosis. PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were searched to September 2025 for studies reporting vertebral HU referenced to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or quantitative CT. Continuous data were synthesised as standardised mean differences (SMD) and diagnostic accuracy using bivariate random-effects models. Reported thresholds were pooled to generate balanced, sensitivity-, and specificity-optimised cut-offs, tested through reconstructed 2 × 2 analyses. Twenty studies including 5016 patients met inclusion criteria. HU values were significantly lower in osteopenia and osteoporosis, with pooled SMD -2.78 for low BMD versus normal and -1.57 for osteoporosis versus non-osteoporotic bone (p < 0.001). Overall diagnostic performance was excellent (AUC 0.865; sensitivity 0.80; specificity 0.83). Pooled thresholds for osteopenia were 138.9 HU (balanced), 166.7 HU (high), and 111.2 HU (low); and for osteoporosis, 104.6 HU (balanced), 122.3 HU (high), and 86.8 HU (low). Decreasing HU was associated with stepwise increases in relative risk for low BMD. Vertebral HU strongly discriminate normal from low BMD, providing clinically applicable pooled thresholds for opportunistic CT-based screening and perioperative risk assessment. HU assessment could facilitate early detection and management of osteopenia and osteoporosis, particularly in surgical candidates.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyHounsfield unitsOsteopeniaOsteoporosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.