ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026
Adjusting fracture probability according to duration of diabetes: the Manitoba BMD Registry.
Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We studied the use of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as an input to FRAX® and trabecular bone score (TBS) to modify FRAX-based probability in individuals with diabetes. Our results help to inform the use of FRAX and FRAXplus in patients with diabetes.
backgroundDiabetes confers increased risk for fracture independently from FRAX-estimated fracture probability. PURPOSE: To compare the relative performance of the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) input and trabecular bone score (TBS) adjustment, alone or in combination, to capture FRAX-independent risk associated with diabetes.
methodsWe analyzed data on 54,609 individuals from the Manitoba Bone Density Program aged ≥ 40 years with FRAX-based probability and TBS measurements (mean age 63.8 years, 89.9% female) including 5274 (9.7%) with diabetes. Incident major osteoporotic fracture (MOF, 5723, 10.5%) and hip fractures (1715, 3.1%) were ascertained during mean 9.6 years observation from population-based healthcare data. The effect of diabetes on fracture outcomes was modeled without (Cox regression) and with competing mortality (Fine-Gray regression), adjusted for FRAX-based probability before and after RA input and TBS adjustment.
resultsFor MOF prediction in those with diabetes duration less than 5 years, no FRAX adjustment was required. For those with duration 5-10 years, FRAX adjusted with TBS was slightly better than the unadjusted FRAX output. For those with diabetes duration greater than 10 years, the larger effect from RA was beneficial, with or without TBS. In contrast, hip fracture risk was consistently greater regardless of diabetes duration and required the use of TBS, with or without RA.
conclusionDiabetes was associated with incident MOF and hip fracture independent of baseline fracture probability, but this risk was partially offset by excess mortality. TBS adjustment and RA input showed complementary benefits for improving fracture prediction that differed according to diabetes duration and fracture outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41961087What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.