Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960956›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026

The Application of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Segmentation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Across Different Optic Neuropathies.

Roya Arian, Milad Behzadi Far, Reza Sadeghi, Farshad Farnaghi, Mona Safizadeh, Prem S Subramanian, Neil R Miller, Yanin Suwan, Pitchapa Kajornrojanaruk, Raheleh Kafieh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roya ArianDepartment of Engineering, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Milad Behzadi FarFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza SadeghiFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farshad FarnaghiFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mona SafizadehFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Prem S SubramanianDepartments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Sue Anschutz-Rodgers University of Colorado Eye Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Neil R MillerNeuro-Ophthalmology Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yanin SuwanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pitchapa KajornrojanarukDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Raheleh KafiehDepartment of Engineering, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Masoud Aghsaei FardFarabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the ability of a deep learning (DL) algorithm to segment retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) from optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans in glaucomatous optic neuropathies and anterior optic neuropathies with optic disc edema. Methods: RNFL-Net was developed after preprocessing and automatically removing blood vessels from peripapillary OCT B-scans. It was trained and validated on 1065 RNFL OCT B-scans, and its performance was assessed using 265 test scans. Two different datasets were used for external testing. Results: The study involved 106 eyes from healthy controls, 118 eyes with optic disc edema, and 60 eyes with glaucoma for training and validation. The segmentation method achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.95 for the validation dataset and 0.92 for test images when compared with manual segmentation. In measuring RNFL thickness in glaucoma-affected eyes, RNFL-Net showed a mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.21 µm and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 11.24%. The standard OCT device had MAE of 11.05 µm and MAPE of 16.8%. For optic disc edema, the RNFL-Net MAE was 13.04 µm and MAPE 5.71%, whereas the OCT device reported MAE of 22.94 µm and MAPE of 11.2%. For the external validation data, MAE values for glaucoma (n = 157) and disc edema (n = 32) cases were 7.19 ± 0.14 and 15.41 ± 0.32, respectively. Conclusions: RNFL-Net can accurately segment RNFL, whereas standard OCT devices produce lower measurements, especially in disc edema. Translational Relevance: RNFL thickness measurements from RNFL-Net matched the ground truth in glaucoma and optic disc edema cases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningNerve FibersOptic Nerve DiseasesRetinal Ganglion CellsAdultAgedFemaleGlaucomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOptic DiskPapilledemaReproducibility of ResultsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID41960956
PMCPMC13086169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.