Trial reportCancer research communications2026
Randomized Phase I/II Clinical Trial of a Melanoma Helper Peptide Vaccine with or without Systemic Agonistic Anti-CD27 Antibody (Varlilumab).
Trial report in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03617328 (Evaluation of Safety and Durable Immunogenicity of Melanoma Vaccination, With or Without Systemic CDX-1127, in Patients With Stage II-IV Melanoma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Safety and Durable Immunogenicity of Melanoma Vaccination, With or Without Systemic CDX-1127, in Patients With Stage II-IV Melanoma
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis randomized phase I/II clinical trial (NCT03617328) was designed to test whether administration of systemic agonistic anti-CD27 antibody (varlilumab) concurrent with a melanoma vaccine is safe and enhances vaccine immunogenicity. PATIENTS AND
methodsAdults with definitively treated, high-risk melanoma were randomized to receive a shared antigen vaccine targeting CD4+ T cells (6 melanoma helper peptides; 6MHP) either with (arm A) or without (arm B) systemic varlilumab over 11 weeks. A final vaccine was given at week 25 to assess memory response.
resultsThirty-three participants were treated at two centers. After enrolling 17 participants, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate with vaccine alone required protocol revision to limit local toxicity. Overall, DLT rates for arms A and B were 6% (1/17) and 31% (5/16), respectively. Twenty (61%) participants had CD4+ T-cell responses ex vivo. Persistent responses were detected in two (2/14, 14%) on arm A and one (1/16, 6%) on arm B. Memory response was detected in two (2/13, 15%) on arm A and four (4/16, 25%) on arm B. On arm A, there was a significant reduction in circulating CD4+ T cells. Four-year disease-free survival rates for arms A and B were 20% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6%-67%] and 69% (95% CI, 49%-96%), respectively.
conclusionsNo synergistic toxicity was observed with combination treatment. Similar durability in immunogenicity was found with or without varlilumab. Depletion of circulating CD4+ T cells with varlilumab may have abrogated benefits of inducing tumor-cognate CD4+ T cells with vaccination. Induction of memory responses supports further work to optimize shared antigen vaccines in combination with other immunotherapies. SIGNIFICANCE: Combination treatment with 6MHP vaccination and varlilumab was safe but did not improve CD4+ T-cell response rates. Circulating CD4+ T cells were reduced with varlilumab, and clinical outcome was improved without varlilumab. This study demonstrates induction of memory responses after shared antigen vaccination; however, CD27 agonism did not enhance durability of response. Depletion of CD4+ T cells after varlilumab may have interfered with the beneficial effects of vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.