Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960885›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging and radiation oncology2026

Faculty of Radiation Oncology 2022 New Zealand Workforce Census.

Jack Mitchell, Melissa James, Nathan Stevens, Hon Trinh, Gerard Adams, Tuan Ha, Marcel Knesl, Edward Sia, Daniel Xing, Ramesh Pandey and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jack MitchellQueensland Health, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3134-694X
Melissa JamesHealth New Zealand, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6123-1951
Nathan StevensRoyal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9588-3371
Hon TrinhNSW Health, Illawarra Shoalhaven Cancer Centre, Nowra, New South Wales, Australia.
Gerard AdamsGenesisCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tuan HaGenesisCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marcel KneslQueensland Health, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.
Edward SiaIcon Group, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Daniel XingQueensland Health, Townsville University Hospital, Douglas, Queensland, Australia.
Ramesh PandeyHealth New Zealand, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nicole BuddleQueensland Health, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.
Yvonne ZissiadisGenesisCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Raphael CheeGenesisCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
RANZCR Economics and Workforce Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reports the findings of the 2022 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) workforce census, providing an updated overview of the New Zealand (NZ) radiation oncology workforce. The purpose was to assess workforce demographics, distribution, training, and service capacity, and highlight challenges that have persisted since the 2018 census.

methodsA survey was distributed to all practicing radiation oncologists and trainees in NZ. Data were collected on demographics, qualifications, workload, practice setting, subspecialty involvement, training experiences, and the perceived impact of COVID-19. Responses were collated and descriptive analyses performed.

resultsThe census recorded a workforce with a median age of 51 years (range 33-71), and 43% female representation. Most worked across both public and private sectors, with high reported working hours. Brachytherapy practice participation declined compared with previous censuses. Among trainees, concerns included workload, job availability, and work-life balance, with many indicating a preference for part-time and/or urban practice. COVID-19 was associated with delays in service delivery, though the majority reported no exam or fellowship disruptions. Anticipated increases in hypofractionation use were noted.

conclusionsThe 2022 census highlights a workforce under strain from high clinical demand, limited growth, and looming retirements. Key challenges include inequitable representation of Māori and Pasifika clinicians, declining subspecialty capacity, and risks of burnout. Coordinated national workforce planning, with a focus on recruitment, retention, equity, and flexible models of training and employment, will be essential to ensure sustainable radiation oncology services in NZ. This census therefore reinforces the urgent need for coordinated national workforce planning to safeguard the future of radiation oncology services in NZ.

Indexed as

Health WorkforceRadiation OncologyWorkforceAdultAgedCensusesCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkload

Identifiers

PMID41960885
PMCPMC13580415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.