Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960853›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026

Postoperative Pain Management After Lumbar Discectomy. A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses and Trial Sequential Analyses.

Josephine Zachodnik, Rachid Bech-Azeddine, Magnus Sandberg, Rebecca Scherwin, Rikke Malene Hartvigsen Grønholm Jepsen, Louise Møller Jørgensen, Kasper Højgaard Thybo, Anja Geisler

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Josephine ZachodnikCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2099-7496
Rachid Bech-AzeddineAleris Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6000-313X
Magnus SandbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-8730
Rebecca ScherwinCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3878-8612
Rikke Malene Hartvigsen Grønholm JepsenCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8138-0356
Louise Møller JørgensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-8586
Kasper Højgaard ThyboCentre for Anaesthesiological Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4727-3132
Anja GeislerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-2672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInadequate postoperative pain management after lumbar discectomy may delay recovery, increase the risk of chronic pain, and prolong hospitalization. Effective analgesic strategies must balance pain control with minimal adverse effects.

objectiveTo identify the most effective postoperative analgesic interventions for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: This systematic review was preregistered in PROSPERO and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials were identified through systematic searches in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was opioid consumption within 24 h postoperatively. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan, with Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to adjust for random errors. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE.

resultsA total of 76 RCTs comprising 5617 participants were included, covering 11 analgesic strategies. Paracetamol, NSAIDs, epidural and intrathecal anaesthetics, local infiltration, nerve blocks, gabapentin, and pregabalin significantly reduced 24-h opioid consumption. Several interventions-including paracetamol, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, ketamine, epidural and intrathecal anaesthetics, local anaesthetics, nerve blocks, gabapentin, and pregabalin-were also associated with lower pain scores at 6 and 24 h. However, evidence certainty ranged from low to very low due to methodological limitations, small sample sizes, heterogeneity, and inconsistent baseline analgesia.

conclusionsMultiple analgesic strategies show potential for reducing opioid use and improving early postoperative pain control after lumbar discectomy. Nevertheless, the low certainty of evidence highlights the urgent need for high-quality, standardized trials to inform clinical practice. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings demonstrate that the following analgesics significantly reduce supplemental opioid consumption and pain levels in the immediate postoperative period: PCM, NSAIDs, intrathecal anaesthetics, epidural anaesthetics, LIA/wound infiltration, nerve blockade, gabapentin, and pregabalin. However, the high risk of bias and low quality of evidence in many of the included trials necessitate cautious interpretation of the findings.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsDiskectomyLumbar VertebraePain ManagementPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID41960853
PMCPMC13067818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.