ArticleEcology2026
A cross-site comparison reveals limited geographic variation in risk avoidance of snowshoe hares.
Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predation risk induces a myriad of behavioral antipredator responses of prey. However, different antipredator behaviors exhibit different degrees of flexibility within a single prey species. Moreover, how predator species composition and traits interact with the flexibility of particular antipredator behaviors to determine spatiotemporal activity patterns of prey remains unknown. We examined geographic variation in multiple behavioral axes of a single prey species, snowshoe hares Lepus americanus, across three different ecosystems in northern North America that differed in the predator guild (Wisconsin, USA, with multiple generalist predators; Isle Royale, Michigan, USA, with a single generalist predator; and Yukon, Canada, with a specialist ambush predator and a generalist predator). We hypothesized that predator species composition and traits would drive divergent behavioral patterns of hares across ecosystems. Using a biologging-based dataset of hare behaviors and a camera-based dataset of predator occurrence collected over multiple winters, we examined diel activity patterns, space use, and movement of hares while accounting for variable environmental conditions. Hares were only slightly less nocturnal (<10%) when faced with a single nocturnal generalist predator (Isle Royale), and they exhibited highly comparable diel activity patterns across all sites. Patterns of spatial risk avoidance of hares were moderately different between the multi-predator systems; hares potentially avoided more lethal predators in Wisconsin and exhibited the opposite patterns of habitat use between daytime and nighttime in Yukon, possibly to avoid the most active predator at each time of day. Additionally, hare movements were shorter and more tortuous where ambush specialist predators were present (Yukon). Our study demonstrates that spatiotemporal risk avoidance of prey can exhibit limited geographic variation, but certain behavioral responses, such as diel activity, may be more conserved across ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.