ArticleMedical physics2026
A deep-learning-based pipeline for automatic fusion of CT coronary angiogram and stress perfusion CMR.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate evaluation of coronary artery constriction and myocardial ischemia is essential for diagnosing and managing coronary artery disease (CAD). Combining CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging allows examination of both coronary artery narrowing and myocardial perfusion. PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning pipeline that integrates CTCA and CMR images, which could help improve accuracy in identifying affected vessels and their associated myocardial territories.
methodsThe proposed pipeline included two deep learning models: one for automatic reorientation of 3D CTCA and another for left ventricle (LV) wall registration between CTCA and CMR images. A 3D spatial co-registration model, the reorientation spatial transformer network (Reorientation STN), predicted reorientation parameters for input CTCA volumes using ResNet18 and STN. A 2D nonrigid spatial deformation network (Nonrigid SDN) was trained for LV wall registration. Cross-modal supervision was employed during training. Evaluation criteria included aspect ratio (AR), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and long-axis deviation angles. The process involved quantifying LV wall perfusion on registered CMR images and extracting coronary arteries from reoriented CTCA images to fuse these results. The pipeline was trained and validated on 447 pairs of CTCA and CMR images from 75 patients and tested on 18 subjects.
resultsThe pipeline achieved an AR of 0.94 ± 0.03, long-axis deviation angles of 1.19 ± 0.83 (axial) and 1.54 ± 0.79 (coronal), a DSC of 0.66 ± 0.04 for LV wall reorientation, and a DSC of 0.92 ± 0.03 for LV wall registration between CTCA and CMR.
conclusionsThis automated framework successfully fuses cardiac CTCA and CMR imaging, demonstrating its potential effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.