Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960684›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2026

Extrapolation of Time-to-Event Survival Outcomes of Histology-Independent Therapies Using a Bayesian Hierarchical Model.

Jan Mikelson, Richard Birnie, Grant McCarthy, Matthew Madin-Warburton, Ruifeng Xu, Justin Chumbley, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Mayur Amonkar, Gianluca Baio, Kate Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jan MikelsonMSD, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5233-4756
Richard BirnieLumanity, Sheffield, UK.
Grant McCarthyLumanity, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8292-8598
Matthew Madin-WarburtonLumanity, Sheffield, UK.
Ruifeng XuMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Justin ChumbleyMSD, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0009-4271-2157
Raquel Aguiar-IbáñezMerck Canada Inc., Kirkland, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3839-6966
Mayur AmonkarMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Gianluca BaioDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4314-2570
Kate YoungMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5637-9871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionHealth technology assessment of histology-independent therapies (HITs) requires statistical methods that can capture heterogeneity in outcomes while allowing borrowing of information between tumor sites to inform cost-effectiveness analysis. In this study, we extend previous work on binary outcomes to the application of Bayesian hierarchical models (BHMs) for extrapolation of overall survival from pembrolizumab-treated patients with microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair solid tumors.MethodsWe considered BHMs based on 1- or 2-parameter distributions for extrapolation of survival outcomes. The scale or rate parameter of each model was assumed exchangeable among tumor types, and the shape parameter was assumed the same for all tumor types in the 2-parameter models. We compared overall survival (OS) and estimated mean survival time for each BHM with the corresponding nonhierarchical model.ResultsExtrapolated OS showed similar results between the BHM and standard models for colorectal, endometrial, and gastric cancers. Small intestine and biliary cancers showed higher OS estimates with a BHM than the standard models due to a combination of smaller sample sizes, information sharing in the BHM, and the use of a common shape parameter. Estimated mean survival times were similar between the BHM and equivalent standard model. However, the BHM showed reduced uncertainty in all cases.ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that BHMs provide a suitable framework to extrapolate time-to-event outcomes for HITs. The results provide extrapolated curves for OS that vary by tumor site, thus capturing and quantifying the inherent heterogeneity within the patient population. BHMs offer advantages in terms of reduced uncertainty around parameters that are often key drivers in cost-effectiveness analyses, such as estimated OS, through the borrowing of information between tumor sites.HighlightsBayesian hierarchical models (BHMs) reduced uncertainty in extrapolation of time-to-event outcomes for histology-independent treatments compared with nonhierarchical models fit to each tumor site.Reduced uncertainty around the mean survival time is a key factor of cost-effectiveness analyses of histology-independent treatments.BHMs provide a suitable framework for extrapolating histology-independent survival outcomes, effectively integrating prior knowledge and explicitly capturing heterogeneity between different tumor sites.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNeoplasmsBayes TheoremCost-Effectiveness AnalysisHumansMicrosatellite InstabilitySurvival AnalysisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalpembrolizumabBayesian hierarchical modeldeficient mismatch repairhistology independentmicrosatellite instabilitymultitumorpembrolizumabsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41960684
PMCPMC13242546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.