ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
Using the readiness assessment for pragmatic trials (RAPT) model to structure partner engagement and strengthen pragmatic research readiness.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Partner engagement is critical for embedded pragmatic research, yet few structured methods guide early collaboration to strengthen feasibility and mutual understanding. In this case study, Brown University researchers and leaders from a US-based medical practice, Bluestone Physician Services, used the readiness assessment for pragmatic trials (RAPT) model to guide structured discussion and qualitative readiness assessment of a partner-identified intervention concept aimed at improving the timing of palliative care services. Collaborative completion of RAPT created a shared process for assessing feasibility, contextual fit, and alignment with Bluestone priorities. The exercise identified domains needing refinement and guided planning to strengthen data, workflows, and measurement, demonstrating that RAPT can serve as a practical framework for early-stage co-design in pragmatic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.