ArticleBioinformation2026
Evaluating stress distribution and clinical success in varied dental implant designs.
Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomechanical implant design influences peri-implant stress distribution and long-term bone maintenance despite modern advances. Therefore, it is of interest to compare traditional threaded, tapered and platform-switched implants in 75 patients receiving 90 implants across varying bone densities and arch locations over 3 years. Platform-switched implants showed 34% lower crestal stress (p<0.001) versus conventional designs via FEA validation. Marginal bone loss measured 0.42±0.18 mm for platform-switched versus higher losses in others (p<0.001), with equivalent survival rates. Platform-switching provides superior biomechanical protection and bone preservation, establishing evidence-based design superiority for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.