Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960531›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

Functional and cosmetic outcome after Septorhinoplasty - A retrospective study.

Ajazul Haq, Sandeep Singh, Preeti Sharma, Deep Jyoti, Rupali Sharma, Pryianka Wahi, Kamal Kishore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ajazul HaqDepartment of ENT & HNS, Government Medical College, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Sandeep SinghDepartment of ENT & HNS, Government Medical College, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Preeti SharmaDepartment of ENT & HNS, Government Medical College, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Deep JyotiDepartment of ENT & HNS, Government Medical College, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Rupali SharmaDepartment of ENT & HNS, Government Medical College, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Pryianka WahiDepartment of ENT & HNS, Government Medical College, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Kamal KishoreDepartment of ENT & HNS, Government Medical College, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of surgical septorhinoplasty is gives the nose an appearance that complements the surrounding facial features and permits an unhindered airway. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate functional and cosmetic outcome after septorhinoplasty using Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). Patient were satisfied with their post ROE in 10 (26.31%) males and 14 (36.84%) females. Satisfaction regarding post-operative PNIF was observed in 10(26.31%) males and 12 (31.57%) females. After a septorhinoplasty, nasal blockage and outward appearance significantly improved and the ROE evaluation and the PNIF monitor make it simple to gauge how satisfied patients are after a septorhinoplasty.

Indexed as

cosmetic outcomesfunctionalSeptorhinoplasty

Identifiers

PMID41960531
PMCPMC13058355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.