Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960506›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2026

A comparative study of immediate versus delayed implant placement in periodontally compromised patients.

Geetika Kumar, Jitendra Kumar Diwakar, Ashutosh Agarwal, Manvi Chandra Agarwal, Prerna Agarwal

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geetika KumarDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Jitendra Kumar DiwakarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ashutosh AgarwalDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manvi Chandra AgarwalDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Prerna AgarwalDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal timing of dental implant placement in periodontally compromised patients remains controversial due to concerns regarding bone preservation and implant stability. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed dental implant placement in such patients. A total of 200 participants were randomly allocated to Group A (immediate placement) and Group B (delayed placement). Implant success rates, bone preservation, soft tissue health, implant stability, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Although both groups showed high success rates, delayed implant placement demonstrated superior bone preservation, greater implant stability, and improved long-term functional outcomes.

Indexed as

Bone preservationdental implantsimplant stabilitypatient satisfactionperiodontal disease

Identifiers

PMID41960506
PMCPMC13058345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.